Over the weekend, during a brief interlude of faint
curiosity/ boredom, I succumbed to the temptation of filling out one of those
internet surveys. You know the ones I’m talking about…take our ten question survey to discover your ideal Tuesday work
outfit!! Only this one promised to tell me which political party I was most
aligned with. My son had taken it and posted his results so I thought what the
heck?
It was a rather lengthy list of questions. Since the
survey was presented by a Libertarian website, I expected the questions to be
phrased in such a way as to encourage Libertarian responses, but generally
found them to be fair. It was a YES, NO format. A third option was CHOOSE
ANOTHER STANCE. When this was checked a dropdown box appeared that listed four
or five alternative answers. An example follows:
Should gay marriage be allowed in America?
Yes
No
Choose another stance:
- Let each State decide
- No, allow civil unions for same sex couples, but don’t call it marriage
- Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious matter
- Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse gay marriage ceremonies
Not surprisingly, I found myself clicking the choose
another stance option most of the time. The problem was that often I was
unsatisfied with any of the options I was given even then! Then I was reduced
to the, “add your own stance” answer.
It took me forever to finish the survey. Once completed, I pushed the results
key and was informed thusly:
Parties You Side With:
89% Libertarian
86% Republican
41% Green
30% Democrat
16% Socialist
This survey blows! First of all, I know without
question that the Republican and Libertarian parties do not agree anywhere approaching
85% of the time, and yet it says I agree with them almost equally. Secondly,
the Green party? Do they have a position on abortion or gay marriage? If so,
why? What does the death penalty have to do with the environment? And lastly, I
agree with the Socialist party on something?? Wait..what??
So, I comb through the results searching for my
latent Socialist weaknesses. It turns out that I am a closet pinko because of
my opinion on the National Park Service, as follows:
Should National Parks continue to be preserved and
protected by the Federal Government? My answer was “Yes.” I believe this
largely because the National Park service is one of the very few government
success stories. I have visited many of them and found them to be beautifully maintained,
well run National treasures. The alternative of having a for profit business
running these parks is wrought with peril. I keep imagining a gigantic
billboard announcing how 15 minutes could save me 15% on my car insurance right
next to the Presidents on Mt. Rushmore! The actual “Socialist Party preferred
answer was “Yes, and expand the Federal Governments domain to protect more
land.” Since my answer was “Yes”, it was deemed “similar.” Like I said, this
survey blows.
Another thing that suggested Socialist leanings was
my answer to the question, “Should the US interfere in the affairs of other
countries?” My initial answer was “No.”
Then I clicked the other responses. What
I really believe is closer to “Only when there is a direct threat to our National security.” But, that opening allows
the pinheads in Washington too much parsing of words and nuance and before you
know it the discovery of nonexistent weapons of mass destruction become a direct threat. So, I just went with
plain “No.” BAMM, I’m in league with the Socialists.
So, there you have it. I’m 89% Libertarian and 16%
Socialist. Let’s legalize Marijuana and redistribute wealth!! Potheads of the
world unite!!
No comments:
Post a Comment