An Open Letter to the Southern Baptist Convention,
I have been a member of a Southern Baptist church
for most of my adult life. I came to faith in Christ in no small part through
the teachings and ministry of one such church. My Father is a retired Southern
Baptist pastor, having said all of that, whenever anyone asks me about my
religion, I never answer, “I’m a Southern Baptist.” Instead, I usually say that
I’m a Christian. The reason for that is the subject of this letter.
There are many amazing things about the Southern
Baptist church, things of which I am very proud. Through the Cooperative Program,
Southern Baptists have found a way to leverage the giving power of 45,000 churches
and turn it into an amazing missions organization that supports over 5000 missionaries
who serve over 950 different people groups around the world. In the United
States, whenever there is a disaster, a tornado, flood or hurricane, groups from
local Southern Baptist churches are some of the first relief organizations on
the scene and usually the last to leave. As a denomination, Southern Baptists
have done more to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ than any other organization
I know of. This has been the single focus of our existence and is worthy of
great praise accordingly.
But then, once a year we have a convention. Each
church elects “messengers” to attend. Speeches are made, songs are sung, and
then like the sun rising in the east and setting in the west, we do something
stupid. This year it involved the Boy Scouts of America.
Recently the BSA changed its rules and decided not
to prohibit openly gay boys from joining. Actually, the wording stated that
being gay could no longer be the sole reason for an applicants’
disqualification. For reasons that escape me, the Southern Baptist Convention
decided that it needed to get involved in the membership controversy of an
organization that has nothing to do with the Southern Baptist church. Well,
that’s not exactly true. In the United States, over 100,000 scouts do hold their
weekly meetings in some 4,000 local Baptist churches. But the Convention has no
power to force a local congregation to prohibit such meetings, so, why make a
statement about it, which you had to know would be the one single headline to
come out of your entire meeting, “SOUTHERN BAPTISTS SLAM SCOUTS”
I understand that homosexuality is a sin in both the
Old Testament and the New. But, it has a lot of company, and gets nowhere near
as much attention as good old fashioned adultery, dishonesty, pride and greed.
Why no statement about the rampant adultery and divorce among the faithful? How
about a statement coming out against the pornography business which has
destroyed more traditional marriages than homosexuality ever thought about
destroying?
I guess my problem with you guys is one of emphasis.
Why pick a fight with the Boy Scouts? With all the problems facing the world
today, it’s the Boy Scouts membership policy that tops your agenda? With
traditional marriage divorce rates hovering around 50%, why do you spend so much
time railing about the sexual practices of at best 10% of the population? And,
what are we to make of this statement? Are we trying to encourage local churches
to not allow local troops to meet in their buildings because they may have a
gay member? Does this mean that we are against gay people coming to church? I
guess I just don’t understand the method to this madness. Homosexuality is a
sin. I get it. Lots of things are sins. The entire world is full of sinners.
Isn’t it the job of the church to reach them with the message of salvation
through Christ? How does this Boy Scout statement accomplish this? What it does
accomplish, is reinforce the stereotype of Southern Baptists as a bunch of
people who are against everything. We’re against drinking, gambling, dancing
and gays. Well, there goes 75% of the country, and 100% of Washington DC.
Good luck dealing with the fallout from this. Oh,
and the next time you’re sitting in a meeting pondering the problem of
declining membership and influence, you might want to consider coming up with a
list of things that you’re FOR.
Doug I appreciate your thoughts on this. In the blog you asked why there was no statement on adultery/divorce and pornography. In the past they have dealt with these issues. In fact, they have dealt with pornography several times, the last being in 2001 (http://www.sbc.net/resolutions/amResolution.asp?ID=849).
ReplyDeleteIn terms of the divorce rate among Christians, especially Southern Baptist, they have discussed that too. In 2010 they had an interesting resolution called, "On the scandal of southern Baptist divorce" (http://www.sbc.net/resolutions/amResolution.asp?ID=1205). Throughout the years, it seems the SBC has tried to deal with the moral issues of that day, regardless of what they are. I am grateful that they have done this throughout history. It's enlightening to go back and look at the resolutions through the years. I don't think they are picking on the Boy Scouts, just trying to deal with an issue that local churches will be wrestling with.
I believe they have, as a convention, also shared what they are for. In 2009, they discussed the need for adoption and orphan care, which I think is definitely something we should be for! Of course, I'm not sure the headline, "SBC encourages caring for Orphans," draws as much attention as "Southern Baptists Slam Scouts."
I always appreciate your blogs, Doug!
What happened to Thou Shalt Not Judge, sounds to me like we might have to many people playing God.
ReplyDelete